Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of Internal/WinlabMadwifi/PipelineMACPaper


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 15, 2005, 8:23:38 PM (19 years ago)
Author:
zhibinwu
Comment:

—

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Internal/WinlabMadwifi/PipelineMACPaper

    v9 v10  
    55Download [http://www.sigcomm.org/sigcomm2005/paper-KomRam.pdf pdf]
    66
    7 Ramana Rao Kompella, Sriram Ramabhadran, Ishwar Ramani, Alex C. Snoeren[[BR]]
    8 University of California, San Diego
     7''Ramana Rao Kompella, Sriram Ramabhadran, Ishwar Ramani, Alex C. Snoeren''[[BR]]
     8''University of California, San Diego''
    99
    1010== Motivation ==
    … …  
    4848
    4949== Disucussion ==
    50  1. Is a kernel patch a good approach? The kernel & driver are difficult to develop. As long as the software can be stablized, it is a feasible approach.
    51  1. 10ms scheduling resolution, good enough? No. Schedule too many packets in a batch. It's better to use HW timer, a 64-bit timing counter in Atheros chip.
     50 1. Is a kernel patch a good approach? ''The kernel & driver are difficult to develop. As long as the software can be stablized, it is a feasible approach.''
     51 1. 10ms scheduling resolution, good enough? ''No. Schedule too many packets in a batch. It's better to use HW timer, a 64-bit timing counter in Atheros chip.''
    5252
    5353